1. Build the Claim Around Performance and Payment Failures
A missed shipment or unpaid invoice rarely tells the whole story. Review the promised work, delivery, acceptance, payment terms, and notices before choosing a remedy.
Respond to Non-Delivery and Defective Goods
UCC Article 2 applies to goods transactions, while hybrid deals require a scope review. Under § 2-601, nonconforming goods may let a buyer reject all, accept all, or accept some units and reject the rest, subject to Article 2 and the contract.
- Keep orders, specifications, inspection reports, shipping records, and breach notices.
- Compare contract terms with breach of contract litigation remedies.
Trace Cross-Border Payment Problems
Late or partial payment takes more than adding invoices. Currency terms, due dates, setoff claims, and damage limits can change what is owed.
- Separate unpaid sums from downstream losses and check who bears currency risk.
- Keep demands, invoices, bank records, and default responses.
2. Test Force Majeure against the Performance Problem
War, government action, supply disruption, or market change does not automatically excuse performance. Ask what blocked the work and who assumed that risk.
Separate Impracticability from Higher Cost
For qualifying sales contracts, UCC § 2-615 can excuse a seller's delay or non-delivery when an assumed condition fails or government action makes performance impracticable. The contract can impose a greater duty.
- Identify the event and link it to the delayed or missed delivery.
- Check notice, allocation, and substitute-performance terms.
Build Proof Around Cause and Timing
The record should show what changed and how it affected performance. Higher cost alone does not automatically excuse the deal.
- Keep government orders and supplier notices.
- Record changed conditions and practical alternatives the parties considered.
3. Resolve Arbitration and Forum Conflicts before the Merits

A sound breach claim can stall over forum. Read governing-law, arbitration, forum, and amendment terms together before filing.
Determine Which Dispute Provision Controls
CPLR 7501 recognizes written arbitration agreements. The Federal Arbitration Act may also govern contracts involving commerce, so identify the operative agreement and clause scope first.
| Provision | Main Question | Review Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Arbitration | Must the claim be arbitrated? | Scope, seat, rules, claims |
| Forum | Which court was selected? | Chosen court or venue |
| Governing law | Which law applies? | Contract rights and duties |
Test Choice-of-Law and Forum Terms
General Obligations Law §§ 5-1401 and 5-1402 address selected law and court forums for qualifying deals when statutory conditions are met. They do not replace an arbitration clause.
- Compare the signed contract, amendments, and incorporated terms.
- Use an international arbitration review to test law, forum, and arbitration terms.
4. Protect Confidential Information during the Dispute
A dispute can become urgent when a former partner keeps sensitive information. Contract and trade-secret issues may need parallel review.
Preserve the Confidentiality Record
Start with what was shared, who received it, and what limits applied. Access logs and messages can tie disputed use to the relationship.
- Define the information and map access, copying, disclosure, and later use.
- Coordinate supported claims with trade secret litigation strategy.
Match Interim Relief to the Risk
An injunction request should identify the conduct to stop and a forum able to grant relief. Overseas activity can raise enforcement issues.
- Define the conduct to stop and keep proof of urgency and ongoing harm.
- Check whether the arbitration agreement addresses interim court relief.
5. Resolve Translation and Contract Meaning Disputes
Cross-border deals can fail over wording. Competing versions, prior dealings, and trade usage may matter when meaning is disputed.
Check Which Contract Language Controls
A term such as “best efforts” does not gain a new legal meaning because parties speak different languages. Start with governing law, signed text, and any controlling-language term.
- Compare each executed version and identify any controlling-language clause.
- Keep drafts and messages tied to disputed wording.
Separate Written Terms from Outside Evidence
For sales contracts, UCC § 2-202 allows a final record to be explained or supplemented by course of performance, course of dealing, or trade usage, subject to its limits.
- Mark the disputed words and separate signed terms from later explanations.
- Identify trade usage tied to the disputed language.
6. Plan Termination and Damages before Walking Away
Termination can create another dispute if the contract does not allow it. Review breach, cure, exit, payment, and damage terms before notice.
Decide Whether Termination Is Supported
A serious failure may support termination, while a lesser or curable breach may not. The contract and governing law should drive the decision, not business frustration alone.
- Identify the breach and follow applicable notice and cure terms.
- Keep mitigation efforts and replacement transactions.
Calculate the Exit Exposure
Damage review should separate direct loss, replacement cost, downstream loss, and contract limits. The figures should match the case theory.
- Connect each claimed loss to the breach and review caps or exclusions.
- Check the broader international contracts framework before fixing the claim.
7. Frequently Asked Questions
Can an international contract dispute be arbitrated if one party objects?
A written arbitration agreement may remain enforceable. Its scope, applicable law, and competing terms control the analysis.
Can a company seek emergency relief before a tribunal is formed?
Potentially. Review the agreement, selected rules, governing law, and court procedures before choosing a route.
What if two signed language versions of a contract conflict?
Start with any controlling-language term and governing law. Other evidence may matter if the rules allow it.
Can an arbitral award reach assets in another country?
Potentially. Recognition depends on the treaty framework and the law where enforcement is sought.
8. Review International Contract Arbitration Strategy with Sjkp
An international contract dispute attorney can help turn a cross-border breakdown into a defined claim, defense, and forum strategy. SJKP's attorneys can review performance records, payment terms, force majeure arguments, arbitration terms, confidentiality issues, termination rights, and damages before the parties choose a procedural path.
13 Aug, 2026

